Ethical Dilemma on Capital Punishment Essay Example.

This article first appeared in the Christian Research Journal, volume 17, number 1 (1994). Historically, the church has affirmed the right of the civil magistrate in matters of capital justice. Contemporary culture, in contrast, is permeated with arguments against capital punishment.

An Ethical Analysis against Capital Punishment Introduction This paper compares and contrasts the two different ethical perspectives for and against Capital Punishment. Capital Punishment is a very sensitive subject because it touches on many important topics such as justice, costs, humaneness and religion.

When a criminal commits a capital crime, they should suffer a punishment which equals the crime and it is thought that the worst punishment possible is the death penalty since it does not only remove a criminal's physical freedom by imprisoning them, it removes their psychological freedom by withdrawing their choice to live.

Capital Punishment: Situation Ethics. Situation ethics argues that a situation should be judged in a case to case method. Joseph Fletcher was a pioneer in bioethics and was involved in the areas of abortion, infanticide, euthanasia and cloning. His ethical beliefs focused on the idea that each action should be considered by the situation and.

Countries employing capital punishment classifies death penalty depending on the virtue ethics present in the specific country. For example, some countries reserved death penalty for murder and treason while other countries direct death penalty for sexual crimes (rape), human and drug trafficking.

Capital punishment is an acknowledged legitimate infliction of death as the penalty since time immemorial, and it is mainly employed for a broad diversity of offenses (Rae, 2009). It is an insufferable denial about the civil liberties thus making it unreliable with the essential principles of the existing self-governing system.

Sentencing a criminal to death does not solve the questions and problems left behind, it just creates controversy. Capital punishment is wrongly practiced and immoral and the wrong way to punish criminals. Life in prison without parole is a much better option, whereas capital punishment is just a way to seek revenge on the individual.

Research papers on an ethical argument for capital punishment present the death penalty issues in a pro-death penalty light. Capital punishment has many different ethical issues involved in it and Paper Masters can custom write a research paper on any of the sociological arguments that favor capital punishment.

Capital punishment is defined as execution as a punishment for a person convicted of committing a crime. This form of punishment is usually perceived in the United States as being reserved for crimes such as aggravated murder, felony murder, and contract killing, but in reality the application of capital punishment varies widely.

The Ethics of Capital Punishment A Philosophical Investigation of Evil and Its Consequences. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of. of capital punishment must rest on some alternative basis—if such punishment is.

Ethics in the context of research is particularly interested in the analysis of ethical issues that arise in research with people as participants. The primary concern of any research project is to protect the participants involved in the study and to ensure that the research is carried out in order to serve the interest of individuals, groups or the society as a whole.